Work quietly.
Succeed loudly.
Give boldly

Did You Know

$552,584

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aenean

7,126

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aenean

Testimonials

[rt-testimonial id="1489" title="Testimonial Slider"]

Tag: Long Island

How Public Affairs Can Support Business Growth Across Long Island, NY

Posted on by praxis

Public Affairs Consulting on Long Island: Planning for Growth

Public affairs consulting on Long Island helps businesses assess the public decisions behind a growth plan. A company may see a promising Long Island market and still face questions that do not fit neatly into a traditional business plan. Can a site support the intended use? Which municipality controls the approval? Will infrastructure capacity affect the schedule? How could a proposed policy change operating costs? Which community stakeholders need accurate information before the project becomes public?

These are public affairs questions, but their consequences are commercial. They influence timing, capital, hiring, reputation and the ability to carry out a growth strategy. Public affairs consulting on Long Island helps organizations understand that external environment before it becomes a source of delay or avoidable conflict.

The work is not a substitute for legal, engineering, financial or operational advice. It connects those disciplines to government processes, policy conditions and stakeholder relationships so business decisions are made with a fuller view of risk.

Growth Happens Inside a Public Environment

Every business operates within rules and public systems. Land use, transportation, utilities, environmental review, taxation, workforce programs, procurement and economic development incentives can all affect a project. On Long Island, those responsibilities are distributed across state agencies, counties, towns, villages, special districts and public authorities.

A strategy that ignores this structure may underestimate the time required to move from investment to operation. A company can also lose credibility by announcing a schedule before understanding the formal process. Public affairs research helps leadership distinguish assumptions from confirmed requirements.

Praxis’s government relations practice helps clients navigate more than 900 governmental and related municipal entities across Long Island and Queens. The practical lesson is simple: regional familiarity matters, but each proposal still requires a specific jurisdictional map.

Anticipating Policy and Regulatory Change

Businesses often monitor competitors and customers more closely than government agendas. Yet a rule, budget decision or agency program can alter the economics of an investment. Waiting until a policy is final leaves leadership reacting to a condition it might have prepared for earlier.

Public affairs monitoring should focus on issues tied to the organization’s actual operations. Which legislative committees, agencies, municipal boards or public authorities influence the business? What proposals are moving? When are budgets adopted? Which public consultations create a legitimate opportunity for input?

Useful monitoring does more than circulate news. It explains the likely business effect, level of uncertainty, decision timeline and responsible authority. That analysis allows executives to decide whether to observe, prepare, educate stakeholders or participate formally.

How Public Affairs Consulting Helps Navigate Long Island Approvals

Site selection and development decisions can commit significant resources before every public issue is known. Early public affairs planning can identify the municipal threshold for a potential zoning or planning application, the agencies likely to review it and the concerns that may affect feasibility.

This work should occur alongside legal and technical due diligence. The public affairs role is to map process and stakeholders, not to issue legal conclusions or engineering findings. When the disciplines coordinate, leadership receives a clearer view of what is required, what remains uncertain and what could change the schedule.

The same principle applies outside real estate. A transportation provider, energy company, healthcare organization or contractor may need licenses, public partnerships, procurement knowledge or agency coordination. The growth plan should include those dependencies from the start.

Public Affairs and Community Trust on Long Island

Growth can create jobs, services and tax revenue while also raising legitimate questions about traffic, infrastructure, neighborhood character, environmental effects or public cost. Organizations build trust by acknowledging both sides of that reality.

Stakeholder engagement should begin with listening. Who will experience the project directly? What information do residents, civic groups, labor, business organizations and public officials need? Which concerns can be addressed through design or operations, and which require a clear explanation of tradeoffs?

A polished announcement cannot compensate for a proposal that ignores local experience. Conversely, early engagement can reveal practical changes that strengthen the project. The objective is not unanimous agreement. It is a credible process in which affected stakeholders receive accurate information and a meaningful opportunity to be heard.

Public Affairs Consulting on Long Island and Business Development

Business development is often described as generating opportunities and relationships. Public affairs adds an understanding of the governmental and community environment surrounding those opportunities. Together, they help organizations determine not only whether a prospect is attractive, but also whether the path is realistic.

Praxis offers a discreet, relationship-based approach to business development, including strategy, special events and communications outreach. It also provides government relations and public affairs support. This combination is useful when an opportunity depends on both private-sector partnerships and public-sector coordination.

The strongest relationship strategy is selective. Praxis researches business inquiries, screens for conflicts with existing clients and considers organizational compatibility before engagement. For a client, that discipline protects trust and reduces the risk of pursuing connections without a clear purpose.

Using Incentives as Part of a Larger Strategy

State and local incentives may support qualifying investments, but they should not be the sole reason a project appears viable. Industrial Development Agencies and other economic development bodies evaluate projects under governing law, policy and public-benefit criteria. Programs, eligibility and approval standards can change.

A public affairs advisor can help an organization understand the agencies and processes involved, coordinate supporting information and communicate the project’s expected benefits. Financial and legal professionals should evaluate the economic value, obligations and compliance requirements.

A responsible application addresses jobs, investment, community effects, implementation and accountability with specific evidence. Overstated projections may create short-term attention but weaken long-term credibility.

Measuring Public Affairs Consulting on Long Island

Public affairs should be evaluated against defined business and process goals. Activity alone is not enough. Meetings, events and media coverage may support the strategy, but they are not the final outcome.

Measures might include identifying a regulatory risk before investment, completing an approval milestone, improving stakeholder understanding, securing a qualified partnership, resolving an agency issue or creating a realistic path for a project. The organization should also track relationship quality and whether commitments were met.

Some outcomes take longer than a sales cycle or quarterly report. That makes disciplined documentation important. Leadership needs to understand what changed, what remains outside the organization’s control and what the next decision point will be.

A Better Foundation for Long Island Growth

Long Island business growth is shaped by market opportunity and by the public systems that support land, labor, transportation, utilities and community life. Companies that understand both sides are better prepared to invest responsibly.

Public affairs consulting on Long Island gives leadership an earlier view of policy, process and stakeholder conditions. It does not guarantee a government decision or eliminate disagreement. It helps the organization make better choices, communicate more credibly and pursue growth with fewer blind spots.

Praxis supports businesses through government relations, business development, communications and stakeholder strategy across Long Island and Queens. To discuss a growth initiative, contact Praxis at 631-423-8300.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does public affairs support business growth?

It helps leaders understand government processes, policy changes and stakeholder concerns that can affect approvals, investment, schedules and reputation.

Is public affairs only for regulated industries?

No. Any organization affected by public policy, land use, infrastructure, procurement, incentives or community decisions may benefit from public affairs planning.

When should a company bring in a public affairs consultant?

Ideally before committing major capital, announcing a sensitive initiative or entering a formal approval process. Earlier work provides more time to identify risks and improve the plan.

Can public affairs guarantee an approval or incentive?

No. Government bodies retain their legal authority and discretion. Public affairs improves preparation, communication and participation, but it should not promise a public decision.

What is the difference between business development and public affairs?

Business development focuses on commercial opportunities and strategic relationships. Public affairs focuses on government, policy and stakeholders involved in public decisions. Many Long Island projects require both.

How Nonprofits Can Build Stronger Relationships with Government Agencies

Posted on by praxis

Nonprofit Government Relations Starts With Shared Responsibilities

Nonprofit government relations connects organizations and agencies that often serve the same people from different positions. An agency may set policy, administer funding or oversee compliance. A nonprofit may deliver services, organize residents and see emerging needs before they appear in public data. When those perspectives are connected, both institutions can make better decisions.

The relationship does not strengthen automatically. Nonprofits are frequently stretched by program delivery, fundraising and reporting deadlines. Agency staff also manage legal requirements, limited budgets and competing public priorities. Contact may occur only when an application is due or a problem has become urgent.

A stronger nonprofit government relations strategy replaces episodic outreach with consistent, useful communication. The goal is not access for its own sake. It is to become a credible partner that understands public responsibilities and contributes information agencies can use.

Understand the Agency Before Making an Ask

Before requesting funding, a policy change or operational assistance, a nonprofit should understand the agency’s authority. What programs does it administer? Which decisions can staff make, and which require legislative, regulatory or budget approval? What geographic area and population is the agency responsible for serving?

This research prevents an organization from asking the right question of the wrong office. It also shows respect for the agency’s time. Public websites, enabling statutes, adopted budgets, meeting materials, program guidance and grant notices can reveal how a decision is made and what evidence will be relevant.

On Long Island, jurisdiction can be especially complicated. A service issue may involve New York State, Nassau or Suffolk County, a town, village, special district or public authority. Mapping those roles helps the nonprofit coordinate rather than send disconnected requests to every available contact.

Build Nonprofit Government Relations Between Deadlines

A relationship formed only during grant season is likely to remain transactional. Nonprofit leaders should create appropriate opportunities to brief agency staff throughout the year. Updates can be concise: what the organization is seeing, how demand is changing, which program results are meaningful and what implementation barriers clients are facing.

Useful communication is different from frequent communication. Agencies do not need promotional language or long reports without a clear purpose. They need accurate information connected to their responsibilities. A short briefing with a defined question can be more valuable than a general request for support.

Consistency also protects the relationship when staff or elected leadership changes. The nonprofit should maintain an institutional record of contacts, commitments, reporting requirements and next steps rather than allowing the relationship to live in one employee’s inbox.

Bring Evidence and Lived Experience Together

Nonprofits possess two forms of knowledge that government agencies need. Program data can show how many people were served, where demand is concentrated, which outcomes improved and what resources were required. Direct experience can explain why a policy works differently in practice than it appears on paper.

Neither form should stand alone. A personal story can make an issue understandable, but it should not be presented as proof that every participant has the same experience. Aggregate data can show a pattern, but it may hide barriers faced by specific communities. Responsible advocacy connects the two and protects confidentiality.

Organizations should be ready to explain how information was collected, what period it covers and what its limits are. When the nonprofit does not know, saying so preserves more credibility than stretching the evidence.

Respect Compliance and Ethical Boundaries

Nonprofits must understand the rules that apply to their tax status, funding and advocacy. The Internal Revenue Service allows public charities to engage in some lobbying, but lobbying cannot become a substantial part of their activities under the applicable federal rules. Restrictions on partisan political campaign activity are separate and strict.

Government grants and contracts may add requirements involving allowable costs, reporting, procurement, confidentiality or public recognition. State and local lobbying laws may also require registration or reporting when activity crosses defined thresholds. Organizations should obtain legal or tax guidance for their specific circumstances rather than relying on a general article.

Compliance should not be treated as a reason to avoid public policy. It is a framework for participating responsibly. Board members and staff should know who is authorized to speak, which positions have been approved and how contacts are documented.

Make Requests Specific and Actionable

A broad statement such as “support our mission” leaves an agency unsure what action is being requested. A strong ask identifies the problem, the requested decision, the responsible authority, the people affected, the supporting evidence and the expected public benefit.

The nonprofit should also address implementation. What would the request cost? What staff or partners are needed? How will outcomes be tracked? What risks could prevent success? Agencies must consider fairness, legal authority and competing demands, so the organization should not frame legitimate questions as opposition.

If the agency cannot grant the request, ask what pathway is available. The answer may involve a different office, budget cycle, pilot program, legislative action or partnership. A respectful “not through this process” can still provide useful direction.

Be a Partner After the Decision

Relationship-building continues after funding is awarded or a policy is adopted. Nonprofits should meet reporting commitments, raise problems early and share outcomes honestly. Agencies need to know not only that a program succeeded, but also what required adjustment and what future planning should account for.

Public recognition should be accurate and consistent with grant or agency guidance. If several partners contributed, credit should reflect the work. When problems arise, direct communication is usually more constructive than allowing an agency to learn about them through a public complaint.

This follow-through turns a single transaction into institutional trust. It also helps both sides improve the next program, grant or policy decision.

How Praxis Supports Nonprofit Organizations

Praxis has more than 30 years of experience supporting select Long Island-based nonprofit organizations. Its services include board management, governance and recruitment, membership growth, budgeting, fundraising, events, communications, advocacy, education support and database administration.

That operational perspective matters in nonprofit government relations because advocacy must connect to an organization’s capacity. A persuasive request is not enough if governance, reporting or implementation systems cannot support it.

Praxis helps nonprofits clarify goals, understand the governmental landscape and communicate with the people and agencies involved. To discuss advocacy or nonprofit management support, contact Praxis at 631-423-8300.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a 501(c)(3) nonprofit lobby government officials?

Public charities may conduct some lobbying within federal limits, but partisan campaign intervention is prohibited. Organizations should review IRS guidance and seek advice for their specific activities.

What should a nonprofit include in an agency briefing?

Include the issue, relevant service data, affected population, requested action, implementation considerations and a clear contact for follow-up.

How often should nonprofits communicate with agencies?

There is no universal schedule. Communication should be consistent enough to maintain an informed relationship and purposeful enough to respect staff time.

What makes a nonprofit a credible government partner?

Reliable data, honest limits, timely reporting, respect for agency authority, consistent messaging and follow-through all strengthen credibility.

Should a nonprofit contact elected officials or agency staff first?

It depends on who has authority over the issue. Mapping the process first helps determine whether the correct entry point is legislative, administrative, regulatory or local.

How Public-Private Collaboration Is Shaping the Future of Long Island Communities

Posted on by praxis

No single organization will solve Long Island’s biggest challenges. Not government. Not business. Not nonprofit organizations.

Housing affordability, transportation, infrastructure, workforce development, economic development, energy resilience, and environmental sustainability have become too interconnected for any one sector to address alone. That reality is changing the way communities approach leadership—and why public-private collaboration has become more important than ever.

At Praxis, we’ve found that the strongest public policy outcomes rarely emerge from one organization with all the answers. They emerge when government agencies, businesses, nonprofit organizations, educational institutions, healthcare providers, and community leaders bring different perspectives to the same table and commit to solving problems together.

The future of Long Island will depend on partnerships that recognize one simple truth: today’s challenges require shared leadership.

How Collaborative Leadership Strengthens Public Policy

Communities today face issues that are interconnected in ways they have never been before. A conversation about housing quickly becomes a discussion about workforce recruitment and retention. Transportation affects access to jobs, healthcare, and education. Infrastructure planning influences economic growth, emergency preparedness, environmental resilience, and long-term investment.

Each decision has ripple effects across multiple sectors. That is why collaboration is no longer optional. It is essential.

Public-private partnerships allow communities to examine issues from multiple perspectives, creating solutions that are more informed, more balanced, and more sustainable over time.

Cross-Sector Partnerships Matter on Long Island

Across Long Island, collaboration already plays an important role in shaping the region’s future. Municipalities work alongside business organizations to encourage economic development. Universities partner with employers to prepare tomorrow’s workforce. Healthcare providers collaborate with nonprofit organizations to improve access to care. Community organizations work with local governments on housing, environmental sustainability, downtown revitalization, and infrastructure initiatives—priorities that organizations like the Long Island Regional Planning Council have made central to the region’s long-term planning.

These partnerships often happen quietly, outside the public spotlight. Yet they are responsible for many of the projects and programs that improve quality of life throughout the region.

The lesson is clear. The strongest ideas rarely come from one organization acting alone. They emerge through collaboration.

Building Better Public Policy Through Strategic Collaboration

Before launching a new initiative, communities should pause to ask a different set of questions. Who needs to be part of this conversation? What perspectives are missing? How will this decision affect residents, businesses, educational institutions, and community organizations? Are we solving today’s challenge—or preparing for tomorrow’s?

These questions encourage organizations to think beyond individual priorities and focus instead on long-term regional outcomes. That shift in thinking often produces stronger public policy than rushing toward the first available solution. It is the same approach that guides our government relations work with municipalities and organizations across the region.

Why Trust Is the Foundation of Public-Private Partnerships

Partnerships are not built by signing agreements. They are built through relationships. Organizations must establish trust before they can solve complex problems together.

That requires transparency. It requires listening. It requires acknowledging that no single organization has every answer.

Communities are more likely to support initiatives when they believe their voices have been heard and their concerns have been genuinely considered. Trust does not eliminate disagreement. It creates the foundation needed to work through it.

Regional programs like The Energeia Partnership show what this looks like in practice—bringing leaders from Long Island’s public, private, and nonprofit sectors together around the region’s most complex issues.

Using AI to Support Community Development

Artificial intelligence is changing how organizations analyze information, forecast trends, evaluate infrastructure needs, and better understand community priorities. Communities can use AI to identify transportation patterns, improve infrastructure planning, analyze workforce needs, and better understand economic development opportunities.

These technologies provide valuable insights. But they do not replace collaboration. AI can recognize patterns. It cannot determine community priorities. It can process information. It cannot build trust among stakeholders.

The organizations that will benefit most from AI are those that combine technological innovation with meaningful community engagement and informed leadership. Technology strengthens decision-making. People strengthen communities.

How Collaboration Will Shape Long Island’s Future

Long Island has always been defined by innovation, resilience, and a willingness to adapt. The challenges ahead are significant: preparing the workforce of tomorrow, strengthening transportation networks, expanding housing opportunities, modernizing infrastructure, supporting economic development, and protecting natural resources.

These are not separate conversations. They are part of the same regional story.

The organizations that will have the greatest impact are those willing to work across sectors, embrace diverse perspectives, and build partnerships that extend beyond individual projects or political cycles. Public-private collaboration is more than a strategy. It is becoming the foundation of effective leadership.

Long Island’s future will not be defined by the organization with the loudest voice. It will be shaped by leaders willing to bring different perspectives together, ask better questions, and build partnerships that outlast any single project or policy initiative.

Because the strongest communities are not built by one sector acting alone. They are built through collaboration, trust, and a shared commitment to creating solutions that serve the entire region.

That is where meaningful public policy begins. And that is where Long Island’s future will be shaped.

Interested in how cross-sector partnerships can support your organization? Learn more about what we do or contact Praxis.

Changing the Narrative: How Long Island is Transforming Mental Health Care

Posted on by praxis

Mental health research has grown exponentially in the twenty-first-century, highlighting the severity and global relevance of mental health issues. As the conversation has expanded, Long Island has expanded the care it offers. Committed to improving the lives of those suffering, Long Island prioritizes easy access to proper services and high-quality care for anyone in crisis. Ensuring that the Island’s communities are knowledgeable about local facilities offering top-of-the-line care is where the story begins; delivering effective and compassionate treatment is where the story truly flourishes. 

The Unfortunate History of Mental Health

Progress has been the defining characteristic of mental health over the past decade. With increased knowledge and understanding of the human mind, awareness has grown in tandem. Despite the conversation’s growth, the field is lacking in proper care. Stigmas persist, disorders are often dismissed as unreal or, conversely, the person is deemed dangerous or crazy, and many live in fear of asking for help. With unfair and typically uninformed perceptions, the public understanding of mental health is subject to continued distortion. 

 

The topic of mental health cannot be discussed without addressing the hardships this industry has forced on the suffering. Specifically, America’s complicated history with psychiatric hospitals were infamously known for being a place an individual sought help, but were never discharged. 

 

These institutions were wildly inaccurate in their preconceived notions of mental health, failed provide proper care, and were often places of further trauma, torture, and overall distress. Rather than being a place of peace and recovery, the patient’s issues often worsened due to the living conditions. Severe overcrowding, underfunding, and persistent abuse failed many individuals. 

Long Island Seeks Change

Thankfully, the dangerous institutions prevalent in the 1940s and 1950s have since been eradicated. As the current climate and culture surrounding mental health advances, Long Island will continue to conquer this matter, giving it the attention and funds it deserves. 

 

The Community Crisis Center in Hicksville, Nassau County, a designated ‘safe space’ for those in need of stabilization and comfort, opened in December of 2025. This 6,600-square-foot nonprofit clinic runs a 24/7 operation to all those who seek help. This clinic’s creation was financed by funds from the state and Nassau County, allowing any patient regardless of their economic status to receive services. Completed at the end of the year, this Long Island clinic is prioritizing well-being over everything in the new year. Health insurance and affordability do not take precedent over the patient. 

 

Dana Pope, a peer specialist at the Community Crisis Center is confident that this facility will provide appropriate care and avoid the trauma-inducing nature of psychiatric wards. As an individual who suffered mentally in her own life, Pope recalls her first emergency room hospitalization for suicidal ideation at age 13, “the scariest experience of [her] life.” Upon arriving at the psychiatric ward, her clothes were taken by hospital officials, forcefully separated from her mother, and was not allowed to see any visitors for 48 hours. 

 

This Long Island crisis center, which includes a family room, is a safe space free of any stigma and shame. In stark contrast to Pope’s personal experience, this facility will serve the patients and their families with compassion, treating mental health with immense care and gentleness. 

With psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, care specialists, and substance abuse professionals, and therapists working around the clock, patients will receive high quality care and attention. Along with the facility’s family room is a “Hope” Room where patients can speak with family, a therapist, or other staff, along with a community room offering entertainment amenities, and a children’s area, creating an environment focused on comfort, not fear. 

 

Dedicated to not only providing affordable access to diligent services, Long Island also seeks to diminish the stigma surrounding mental health. Through initiatives like this crisis center as well as other new facilities targeting mental health issues such as substance abuse, the region is redefining what mental health care looks like. By focusing on empathy and unwavering commitment, no one is alone in their journey to healing. 

FAQ

Where is the crisis center located? 

The address for the Long Island Community Crisis Center is 950 S Oyster Bay Rd, Hicksville, NY 11801. 

 

Who can seek care at the crisis center?

Anyone. Regardless of age, background, or economic status, anyone can seek mental health services. 

 

Do patients need health insurance to receive care?

No. Care at the Community Crisis Center is funded by the state and Nassau County, allowing patients to receive services regardless of insurance coverage or ability to pay.

 

Are families involved in the treatment process?
Yes. The center recognizes the importance of family involvement and provides designated spaces, including a family room, to encourage healthy communication and support when appropriate. 

 

Why is Long Island investing in mental health services?

As awareness of mental health issues continues to grow, Long Island is prioritizing expanding resources to meet community needs. Investing in crisis centers and related services reflects the island’s commitment to mental well-being. 

 

See full article here: Community Crisis Center, a ‘safe place’ to stabilize those with mental health issues, opens in Hicksville next month 

 

Website: Community Crisis Center

 

Long Island’s Commitment to the Medicaid Crisis Through Advocacy

Posted on by praxis

Federal cuts to Medicaid, the loss of Affordable Care Act subsidies, and inflation across the United States have prompted Long Island community health centers to demand a greater healthcare budget. Operators of these centers offer healthcare to all patients, regardless of their ability to pay. Since these cuts will likely cause many New Yorkers to lose their health insurance, there is an increased need for funding from the state to ensure centers can continue providing comprehensive care. With these inevitable changes on the horizon, Long Island remains committed to advocating for all its residents through means of collaboration. 

Who is Taking Action?

With such changes in action and on the horizon, Harmony Healthcare Long Island, Sun River Health, Long Island Select Healthcare, and other centers across New York State are requesting $300 million in funding. The state’s upcoming budget decision will be finalized by April 1st of this year. 

Putting those at risk of losing insurance at the forefront of this issue is the primary motivator of all Long Island healthcare center operators. Knowing this issue will impact Long Islanders is what prompts a people-first mentality. Specifically, the president and CEO of Community Health Care Association of New York State, Rose Duhan, emphasizes that “Lawmakers have an opportunity right now to turn words into action by making a transformational $300 million investment in community health centers in this year’s budget.”

How Many Long Islanders Will be Affected?

In 2025, nearly 680,000 residents of Nassau and Suffolk counties relied on Medicaid for their healthcare. In addition, 48% of births were covered by Medicaid, and four in every 9 Long Island children or disabled individuals were covered by Medicaid, 15.2% of whom were seniors. 

Nearly 1.5 million New Yorkers are at risk and will be potentially affected by the Medicaid cuts. On Long Island, 28,000 residents enrolled in subsidized Affordable Care Act plans will likely face a 32% cost increase. An additional 70,000 individuals who do not currently pay premiums may be required to pay a portion of their costs, and a likely increased amount if subsidies are not extended. 

The cuts to Medicaid will increase the demand and stress on emergency rooms and urgent care centers. Lacking any other option due to a loss in insurance elicits, those in need of medical care will seek help from already strained emergency rooms. This strain on medical facilities transcends into outside care as well. For example, home care will be impacted, a form of care that many elderly depend on.

Collaboration is Key

Long Island is determined to approach these issues with unwavering devotion to residents. Changes to Medicaid and healthcare have occurred numerous times, requiring resilience and effective problem-solving skills displayed by local leaders. Continuing to support the most vulnerable residents, partnerships and fundraising among different Long Island organizations will ensure help is provided throughout Nassau and Suffolk counties. 

David Nemiroff, president and chief executive of Harmony Healthcare Long Island, is exploring a partnership with Nassau University Medical Center. This initiative will lessen the costs for patients. Nemiroff specifically states that “It would be mutually beneficial to work together. There’s something that we do better on the outpatient side.”

While the challenge at hand appears daunting, the push for state aid as well as the local initiatives created by healthcare leaders are proactive actions with real impact. By strengthening and increasing partnerships, expanding outreach efforts, and advocating for sustainable funding, Long Island is seeking the best options for its residents. Historically, policies have changed and will continue to change, but Long Island’s commitment to healthcare will always remain the same: to ensure that every individual, regardless of financial status, receives quality care. 

FAQ

What is happening to Medicaid and ACA subsidies?

Federal Medicaid cuts and the potential expiration of Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies are expected to reduce healthcare coverage for many New Yorkers. Without continued federal support, individuals may lose coverage entirely or face significantly higher premiums and out-of-pocket costs.

Why are Long Island community health centers requesting $300 million in state funding?

Community health centers across New York State, including Harmony Healthcare Long Island, Sun River Health, and Long Island Select Healthcare, are requesting a $300 million investment in the state budget to stabilize healthcare access and ensure centers can continue serving all patients regardless of their financial circumstances.

How many Long Islanders rely on Medicaid?

In 2025, nearly 680,000 Nassau and Suffolk County residents relied on Medicaid. Statistically, 48% of births on Long Island were covered by Medicaid, four in every nine children or disabled individuals depend on Medicaid, and 15.2% of Medicaid recipients are seniors. These numbers demonstrate how deeply Medicaid supports families, children, seniors, and vulnerable residents. 

How many people are at risk of losing coverage?

Nearly 1.5 million New Yorkers are at risk of being affected by Medicaid cuts. On Long Island specifically, 28,000 residents with subsidized ACA plans could see a 32% premium increase in their payments. Additionally, 70,000 residents who currently pay no premiums may be required to begin paying, potentially at higher rates if subsidies are not extended. 

Who is leading advocacy efforts on Long Island?

Healthcare leaders and organizations, including Harmony Healthcare Long Island, Sun River Health, Long Island Select Healthcare, and the Community Health Care Association of New York State, are actively advocating for state support.

Read the full article here: Long Island health centers seek $300 million from state amid federal Medicaid cuts 

 

Cell Phone Bans: What Has History Taught Us?

Posted on by praxis

This past year, New York State joined eight other states in enacting a “bell-to-bell” ban on student cell phone use in schools, set to take effect in the 2025–26 school year. The legislation was met with immediate and, at times, heated opposition. Parents voiced fears about losing communication with their children, educators raised concerns about differing socio-economic realities across districts, and social media platforms—particularly Facebook—became hotbeds of sometimes visceral debate.

Change is hard. But history shows us that resistance to change does not necessarily mean it is wrong. In fact, some of the most effective public health policies began amid deep skepticism and outrage.

If you grew up in the latter half of the 20th century, you may remember how pervasive smoking once was in everyday life. People smoked in bars, restaurants, cars, schools—and even on airplanes. It was normal, accepted, and expected.

That began to change in the 1990s, as research increasingly demonstrated the serious health risks of smoking and secondhand smoke. With greater understanding came a growing recognition that public policy had a responsibility to protect public health. Courageous lawmakers at both the local and national levels began challenging the status quo, proposing smoking bans that were met with fierce opposition. Many bar and restaurant owners predicted economic ruin if smoking were prohibited.

Locally in Suffolk County, those tensions came to a head in 1992, when the Suffolk County Legislature passed one of the broadest smoking bans in the country, reinforcing its reputation for landmark legislation protecting public health and the environment. Led by Legislators Paul Tonna (R–Huntington) and Nora Bredes (D–Stony Brook), the law prohibited smoking in public places, including schools. This move in the name of public health was not without opposition.  Both legislators reported being harassed by opponents of the legislation—harassment they believed extended beyond local residents and business owners and may have included efforts by large tobacco companies leveraging their financial power to intimidate lawmakers. 

With the benefit of hindsight, however, smoking ban legislation is now widely regarded as one of the most important public health actions of its time. Decades later, we can clearly see its positive effects. In 2009, the American College of Cardiology noted, “Public smoking bans seem to be tremendously effective in reducing heart attacks and, theoretically, might also help to prevent lung cancer and emphysema.”  The limits on smoking are now widely accepted and applauded.

The current debate over cell phone bans in schools shares striking similarities with the smoking bans of the past. At its core, the cell phone ban is a public health initiative—one focused specifically on protecting children. Governor Kathy Hochul proposed the policy to create distraction-free learning environments and to address growing concerns about youth mental health linked to smartphone use.

It is worth noting that New York City, home to the largest school district in the country, previously abandoned discussions of a cell phone ban due to parent pushback. Unlike our past local legislators, Tonna and Bredes, that were willing to take a stand for public health, NYC bowed to the pressures of their opponents.  NYC’s failure to act created the imminent need for the State to act.   The statewide effort to curtail cell phone use reflects a broader recognition that unchecked smartphone use may pose long-term risks to students’ academic performance, emotional well-being, and social development.  The State’s “bell-to-bell” rolled out for the current school year and, while opposition is still evident, the benefits are being appreciated.

History reminds us that meaningful public health progress is rarely comfortable at the outset. The smoking bans that once seemed radical and intrusive are now widely accepted—and widely credited with saving lives. As we navigate today’s cell phone debate, the lesson may be the same: resistance is not evidence of failure, but often a sign that real change is underway.

 

References 

American College of Cardiology. (2009, September 21). Banning smoking in public places and workplaces is good for the heart.

Gray, Katti. Target: Smoking. (1994, March 22) Newsday.

Rather, John. (1994, August 28). Smoking ban legislators targeted. The New York Times.

Eyewitness News. (2025, April 29). Gov. Hochul announces $254 billion New York State budget deal; includes cell phone ban.

A New Future for Housing Affordability in Southampton

Posted on by praxis

Original Author: Alek Lewis

Southampton, New York, has long been recognized as a luxurious vacation destination, home to sprawling estates, pristine beaches, and exclusive communities. While hamlets, such as Sagaponack, Water Mill, and Bridgehampton, draw visitors and seasonal residents from across the globe, they also present a significant challenge for those who live and work locally: housing affordability. For Long Island’s working-class residents, like retail employees, healthcare workers, educators, first responders, and other service workers, finding accessible housing in these communities becomes more difficult as the cost of housing increases annually. In some instances, the struggle is so severe that day laborers spend winters in wooded encampments when their finances cannot cover rent or other necessities, highlighting the urgent need for affordable housing solutions on the East End.

The Current Housing Landscape in Southampton

The cost of living in Southampton is among the highest in New York State, with property prices and rental rates far exceeding the reach of many local households. According to the latest Southampton Town Housing Plan, only about 1.4% of housing is considered “affordable,” leaving a large portion of residents priced out of the communities they serve. The median household income for renter households is just $49,505, a stark contrast to property values that often reach seven figures.

The imbalance between wealthy seasonal homeowners and local workers creates a sustainability challenge: 28% of local tax bills are sent to village addresses, yet 72% of these owners do not reside in the community year-round. As Jay Diesling, a member of Southampton’s Community Housing Fund advisory board, explained in a public meeting, this dynamic has “gutted our community” and threatens the long-term viability of Southampton as a place where locals can live and work.

Proposals to Expand Affordable Housing

Recognizing the urgency of this crisis, Southampton Village trustees are actively considering a series of proposals designed to increase affordable housing opportunities. These initiatives focus on several key strategies:

  1. Density Bonuses: Developers may be allowed to build more units than current zoning regulations typically permit, encouraging larger housing projects while incorporating affordable units.
  2. Reduced Apartment Size Requirements: By adjusting minimum unit sizes, the village hopes to make projects more economically feasible for developers while providing a variety of housing options for local workers.
  3. New Land Openings for Housing: Additional parcels of land would be allocated for residential use, creating opportunities for workforce housing developments that cater to those who earn up to 130% of Long Island’s median household income. For a family of four, this translates to an annual income cap of approximately $214,370, ensuring that housing is targeted toward households with genuine local needs.

Workforce Housing: Meeting the Needs of Locals

A critical component of Southampton’s housing initiatives is the creation of workforce housing developments. These units are specifically designed to accommodate residents employed in essential sectors who might otherwise be unable to afford local rents. Rents are based on income levels, helping to ensure that housing remains attainable for individuals and families who sustain the day-to-day functioning of these communities. In addition to supporting workers, this approach reinforces the cultural and economic fabric of Southampton by allowing long-term residents to remain within the village and nearby hamlets.

Targeting Southampton Natives and Local Renters

Efforts to expand affordable housing are also focused on prioritizing Southampton natives and long-term residents, rather than seasonal buyers or outside investors. The high demand for property from wealthy outsiders has historically driven real estate prices upward, creating a financial barrier for locals. By allocating affordable units to households with established ties to Southampton, the town seeks to preserve community identity and provide stability for workers whose labor supports local businesses, schools, and healthcare facilities.

The Role of Village Trustees and Community Housing Fund

Under the current proposals, developers could build projects with up to eight units, 25% of which would be designated as workforce housing. Notably, these units could be created in buildings initially zoned for office use, reflecting a flexible approach to addressing housing shortages. Additionally, village officials plan to collaborate with the Community Housing Fund, which is supported through a half-percent real estate transfer tax. The fund offers grants and incentives to developers, helping to offset costs and encourage the construction of affordable housing. By combining zoning changes, density bonuses, and financial support, Southampton aims to create a more sustainable housing ecosystem that benefits local workers and residents alike.

Read original article here.

FAQ: Affordable Housing in Southampton

What is considered affordable housing in Southampton?
Affordable housing in Southampton typically refers to housing units with rents based on income, designed to be accessible to households earning up to 130% of Long Island’s median income. For a family of four, this is roughly $214,370 per year.

Who qualifies for workforce housing in Southampton?
Workforce housing is aimed at local residents employed in essential sectors such as retail, healthcare, education, and service industries. Priority is given to Southampton natives and long-term residents.

What changes are being proposed to increase housing affordability?
Proposed changes include density bonuses for developers, reduced apartment size requirements, opening additional land for residential use, and converting certain office-zoned buildings into workforce housing units.

Why is affordable housing important for Southampton?
Affordable housing helps local workers remain in the community, supporting local businesses, schools, and healthcare services. It ensures that Southampton maintains a sustainable and diverse population rather than being dominated solely by seasonal or outside investors.

Suffolk Proposes a Ban on Hourly Hotel Rates to Strengthen Human Trafficking Enforcement

Posted on by praxis

Photo Credit: Barry Sloan

Suffolk County is considering banning hourly rates at hotels and motels as part of a broader effort to curb sex trafficking. The region has one of the most severe human trafficking problems in the country, and victims there tend to be younger than in other counties. County leaders say the proposed measures, including outlawing hourly rates, strengthening documentation requirements and retention periods, and mandating the preservation of security footage, are intended to close loopholes that traffickers routinely exploit.

How the Policy is Designed to Disrupt Sex Trafficking Networks

Under the current county code, hotels and motels must collect basic registration information from guests, including names, residence, and arrival and departure dates. However, the existing framework does not fully account for how traffickers exploit temporary rentals and short stays to avoid detection.

The proposed legislation would make four major changes:

  1. Ban hourly hotel and motel rates
    Lawmakers argue that hourly bookings create “attractive venues” for traffickers due to their low cost and fast turnover. Eliminating these rates would require a minimum overnight stay.
  2. Extend guest record retention from three to five years
    Hotels would need to maintain digital copies of guest photo IDs for five years, giving investigators a larger window to review records during long-term trafficking cases.
  3. Require hotels to store security footage for at least 90 days
    Longer retention ensures law enforcement can access crucial video evidence, even if victims come forward weeks or months later.
  4. Increase penalties for noncompliance
    Fines would rise to $250 for a first violation (up from $100) and $1,000 for subsequent offenses (up from $200), reinforcing the importance of compliance.

Together, these updates aim to deter traffickers and provide clearer, more consistent documentation to support investigations.

Human Trafficking Trends in Suffolk County

The legislation follows multiple briefings before the Public Safety Committee earlier this year, where detectives shared data showing how widespread trafficking is on Long Island.

At this briefing, Detective Sgt. James Johnson of the Suffolk Police Department’s Human Trafficking Investigations Unit reported that 529 human trafficking victims have been identified since 2017, and approximately 90% were local residents, rather than individuals brought from outside the country. Before the dedicated unit launched, Suffolk had just two human-trafficking-related convictions. As of this year, there have been 190 arrests resulting in nearly 1,000 charges.

In a 2024 investigation from Newsday, it was reported that Suffolk County is a hub for sex trafficking, where prostitution has been moved off the streets and into hotels.

Investigators also emphasized that trafficking is not confined to small roadside motels. Larger hotels, ranging from mid-tier to upscale, have also been used for trafficking operations. Sgt. Erin Meunkle of the Suffolk Sheriff’s Office described cases where traffickers rented multiple rooms for weeks at a time, using one for drug sales, one for trafficking victims, and another for collecting payments.

Maps presented during legislative briefings identified more than 30 hotels and motels with confirmed trafficking activity across Suffolk County, showing how widespread the problem has become.

Sheriff Errol Toulon Jr. called trafficking “present in nearly every hotel and motel across Long Island,” and stated that the new bill would offer “stronger tools to investigate and put traffickers behind bars.”

Public Hearing and Legislative Timeline

The Public Safety Committee voted to advance the bill to a public hearing scheduled for Tuesday at the legislature’s general meeting in Hauppauge. After public input, the proposal will return to committee before a likely full legislature vote in December.

Legislator Lennon called the proposal “just a start,” noting that additional anti-trafficking initiatives may follow as officials continue to identify vulnerabilities within the hotel and lodging industry.

Read the original article here.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Why is Suffolk County proposing to ban hourly hotel rates?
Suffolk County lawmakers argue that hourly hotel and motel rates create opportunities for sex trafficking and other criminal activity due to their low cost and short duration. By requiring a minimum overnight stay, the county aims to reduce quick-turnover room rentals that traffickers often rely on.

How can the new legislation help prevent human trafficking?
The bill strengthens prevention efforts by combining multiple safeguards: eliminating hourly rates, expanding record-keeping requirements, increasing the length of time hotels must store photo IDs and security footage, and raising fines for noncompliance.

Are only small motels involved in trafficking cases?
No. According to the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office and Police Department, trafficking occurs in both small roadside motels and larger chain hotels. Investigators identified over 30 hotel and motel locations across the county with documented trafficking incidents, showing that the issue spans all types of lodging businesses.

What happens next with the proposed legislation?
The bill is currently headed to a public hearing at the Suffolk County Legislature’s general meeting in Hauppauge. After public feedback, the bill will return to committee for revisions before a potential full vote in December. Legislators expect additional anti-trafficking measures to follow.

How does improved recordkeeping help trafficking victims?
Extended ID retention and longer security footage storage give investigators more time to connect missing persons cases, track movement patterns, and identify traffickers. Even fraudulent IDs provide clues that can support investigations. These records are often critical in building cases and locating victims who may come forward weeks or months later.

What Food Insecurity Means for Senior Long Islanders

Posted on by praxis

What Food Insecurity Means for Senior Long Islanders

Right now, over 300,000 of our Long Island neighbors live with food insecurity, meaning they don’t have reliable access to enough food and often don’t know where their next meal will come from Long Island Cares. Food insecurity disproportionately affects Long Island’s seniors, with senior hunger correlating to negative health outcomes. Senior citizens face unique challenges to accessing food that other demographics may not consider: the impacts of chronic health and mobility issues that are more likely to affect seniors, difficulty with accessing transportation (especially in food deserts), and the reality of living on a fixed income like social security which may not stretch as far as the rising cost of food and cost of living. 

Fresh Produce and Fresh Hope from Long Island Cares:

Organizations on Long Island have been working to address the food needs of older adults in various ways. Long Island Cares—the Harry Chapin Food Bank—has drawn attention for several initiatives designed to support seniors. In August, the organization held its fourth annual fresh produce distribution in Huntington, where nearly 500 older adults participated, according to coverage in Newsday. Events like these are often paired with resource fairs that bring together service providers and community groups. At a recent fair, 18 organizations shared programs and opportunities tailored to older Long Islanders.

Another program associated with Long Island Cares is the “Supporting Our Seniors” Mobile Pantry, which travels to senior centers across the region. These monthly visits focus on distributing emergency meals while also connecting participants with information on nutrition and related services. By bringing resources directly to senior centers, the program has attempted to reduce transportation challenges and make food access more consistent. For many attendees, these visits are not only about food but also about building a sense of community around shared support.

Rising Food Costs and Uncertainty about Aid: 

Rising food prices remain a concern for many households. National data indicate that grocery costs rose an average of 8.5% in the past year, marking the largest year-to-year increase in more than a decade. For seniors on Long Island who may depend on fixed incomes like Social Security, these increases can feel particularly difficult to manage. Policy changes, such as adjustments to tax deductions or work requirements tied to food assistance programs, add another layer of complexity for those already struggling.

Household budgets for older adults often have to cover not only food but also housing, medication, and transportation. Transportation can be particularly difficult in areas on Long Island that experience a shortage of full-service grocery stores. When costs rise unevenly across categories, balancing those expenses becomes more complicated.

Long Island Cares helps bridge the gap between rising grocery prices and limited incomes. By offering access to fresh produce, nutrition support, and connections to vital community services, Long Island Cares ensures that Long Islander seniors don’t have to make the impossible choice between paying bills and putting healthy meals on the table.

Deep Pockets of Food Insecurity

Even in areas of Long Island that may appear food secure, there are pockets where residents struggle with consistent access to food. For seniors, these challenges can feel hidden from public view but remain very real on a household level. Recognizing where these needs exist is an important step in directing support to the right communities.

Long Island Cares 

FAQs

What does “food insecurity” mean?

The USDA defines food insecurity as not having consistent access to enough food for an active, healthy life. For seniors, this can mean uncertainty about when or how they will get their next meal.

Why are seniors on Long Island especially affected?

Long Island’s older adults may face unique challenges such as fixed incomes, mobility issues, chronic health conditions, and limited access to transportation—especially in areas with fewer grocery stores.

What is Long Island Cares doing to help?

Long Island Cares runs initiatives like fresh produce distributions, annual resource fairs, and the “Supporting Our Seniors” Mobile Pantry, which delivers meals and connects seniors with community services.

 

Newsday Article Source